I also volunteered to help when the original thread was going on. Would be nice to see this setup.
-David On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:08:20AM -0700, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > Does anyone know where we are at with this? I am more than willing to > help. > > -dain > > > On Jul 22, 2004, at 9:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >I'm willing to help out - I just about qualify for the requirements I > >guess. > > > >On 23 Jul 2004, at 02:51, Jeff Turner wrote: > >>Would anyone else be willing to help with care and feeding of an ASF > >>Confluence instance? Requirements for the job: > >> > >> a) an ASF committer, preferably been around a few years > >> b) know how to deploy a webapp and admin a Tomcat instance > >> c) somewhat unix-savvy > >> d) willing to commit random bits of time for months to come to do > >>things > >> like upgrades > >> > >>If there's a volunteer or two, I guess the next steps would be to > >>hold a > >>(PMC-ratified) vote and send a mail off to infrastructure@ for advice. > >>They may wish to delay installation until a successor to nagoya is > >>ready. > >> > >> > >>--Jeff > >> > >>On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 05:11:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> > >>>On 21 Jul 2004, at 17:15, Matt Kurjanowicz wrote: > >>>>Hmm, are we moving a little too fast on moving to Confluence? Like > >>>>someone said earlier, we've already switched wiki's once, and I > >>>>don't > >>>>know (beyond wiki -> xdoc) what benefits Confluence has over Wikis. > >>> > >>>Security, features, wiki language, macros for integrating with unit > >>>test code / JIRA reports - but mostly its just a nice tool to use > >>>etc. > >>> > >>>Its like saying, hey this JIRA things OK but whats wrong with > >>>bugzilla. > >>>If you've used both you'll know what I mean. > >>> > >>> > >>>>It may even be easier to update the tool (wiki->xdoc) to understand > >>>>the wiki we have now, rather than transferring the entire site over > >>>>to > >>>>a different wiki system, with yet another syntax... > >>> > >>>There's not that much content. But we could start with just the > >>>manual > >>>in the new wiki, then see how we get on. The great thing about this > >>>internet thing is we can link across websites :). So even if the old > >>>wiki stays around for a while its no biggie > >>> > >>>James > >>>------- > >>>http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ > >>> > >> > >> > > > >James > >------- > >http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ > >
