Bruce,
Can you state your current opinion and reasoning? I think that's
more valuable than a vote, at this stage. I know I'd like to have a
broader discussion to try to agree on the best solution, or at least the
best specific options to propose for a vote. For example, I think we've
kind of gone past the point where "1 tool" or "2 tools" is a useful vote
-- if two, it's a question of which two and what our goals should be for
each. If one, again, what do we attempt to support in that one?
Thanks,
Aaron
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> I spent part of last night and part of this morning re-reading all of
> this info to better understand the dilemma over the deploy tool. After
> reading these two messages a couple times I feel like I understand the
> issues at hand far better than when I cast my vote.
>
> I'm sure that others will find themselves with the same quandary I
> currently have, whereby upon further education of the issues surrounding
> the deployment tool, I wish I could recast my vote. If others do, in
> fact, have the same sentiment, then I propose that the deploy tool vote
> be recalled and we start a fresh vote on the same topic, or, I just
> change my vote. Does anyone else feel this way?
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","<0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]&5R\\"F9E<G)E=\\$\\!F<FEI+F-O;0\\`\\`");'
>
> The Castor Project
> http://www.castor.org/
>
> Apache Geronimo
> http://geronimo.apache.org/
>
