Well I did some debugging and its slowness of my machine. My machine is not able to accurately time 300ms from the time 1 second timeout was set.
I also found during investigation that sometimes even the timer expires at 1300-1400ms. (I think that scan timer expired late) I don't thing if having such an accurate timeout is a requirement. and I don't 6.86 secs is too much time. (other tests in this group also take around same or even more time to run) Thanks, Sandip --- "Alan D. Cabrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nope. The point is to see if the security code > removes the security > context all by itself. Using wait/notify would > require wiring test code > directly into the server. > > The real question is why it takes 1.2s for code that > should take > milliseconds. > > > Regards, > Alan > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dain Sundstrom > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:04 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-553) > Security Timeout Test > > failures > > > > Can this test be rewritten using wait/notify or a > phantom reference? > > > > -dain > > > > -- > > Dain Sundstrom > > Chief Architect > > Gluecode Software > > 310.536.8355, ext. 26 > > > > On Jan 27, 2005, at 9:24 AM, Sandip Ghayal wrote: > > > > > Well we are not doing anything much > > > > > > Just sleeping for 3 second and then sleeping for > 7 > > > seconds. > > > > > > Ok I have experimented with new values. > > > > > > Scan time of 100 ms > > > Timeout value: 2000 ms > > > Sleep 1: 1000 ms > > > Sleep 2: 3000 ms > > > > > > Total test time 6.86 sec > > > > > > I think this should be acceptable. > > > > > > Sorry Alan, don't want any one screaming at you > :-) > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Sandip > > > --- Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> I have to ask - what are we doing that means we > need > > >> to make the > > >> timeouts so long? Is there some intrinsically > long > > >> running operation > > >> here or are things just inefficient? > > >> > > >> I ask 'cos a 15 second test is going to get > Alan > > >> yelled at again :-) > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Jeremy > > >> > > >> > > >> Sandip Ghayal wrote: > > >>> Hi Alan, > > >>> > > >>> Increasing timeout scan did not make any > > >> difference. > > >>> It is one second timeout value that is causing > > >> test to > > >>> fail.(though I do agree timeout scan of 50ms > will > > >> be > > >>> hard on slow computers, which we can increase) > > >>> > > >>> I do feel that timeouts should be in terms of > > >> couple > > >>> of seconds and not just 1 second. > > >>> > > >>> We can surely optimize its value even further, > but > > >> I > > >>> think 5 second should be good enough for test. > it > > >>> takes close to 15secs on my machine to run > this > > >> test > > >>> (with 5 sec timeout) > > >>> > > >>> Cheers, > > >>> > > >>> Sandip > > >>> --- "Alan Cabrera (JIRA)" > > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> [ > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-553? > > > page=comments#action_58168 > > >>> > > >>>> ] > > >>>> > > >>>> Alan Cabrera commented on GERONIMO-553: > > >>>> --------------------------------------- > > >>>> > > >>>> 50ms timeout scan? Yikes, that means that > slower > > >>>> computers will be doing nothing but scanning. > Can > > >>>> you revert the parameters for the test back > and > > >> set > > >>>> the timeout scan to 100ms and see if it > passes? > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>> Security Timeout Test failures > > >>>>> ------------------------------ > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Key: GERONIMO-553 > > >>>>> URL: > > >>>> > > >>>> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-553 > > >>>> > > >>>>> Project: Apache Geronimo > > >>>>> Type: Improvement > > >>>>> Components: security > > >>>>> Environment: Windows XP > > >>>>> Reporter: Sandip Ghayal > > >>>>> Priority: Minor > > >>>>> Attachments: security_Timout_fix.patch, > > >>>> > > >>>> security_Timout_fix.patch > > >>>> > > >>>>> When during Geronimo Build I found the > Security > > >>>> > > >>>> test failures for Timeout Test. > > >>>> > > >>>>> During investigation what I found was my > login > > >>>> > > >>>> context was being dropped during running of > the > > >>>> test. When investigating further I found that > the > > >>>> timeout was set to one second. Where as the > next > > >>>> request came after 1.2 secs (though the sleep > in > > >> the > > >>>> test was for 300 ms). > > >>>> > > >>>>> I think that the time out values and machine > > >> speed > > >>>> > > >>>> is too critical for this test to work with > such > > >>>> precisions. So I propose to increase the > timeout > > >>>> value to 10 secs and increase the sleep times > > >> within > > >>>> the test to 3 secs and 17 secs. (just > multiplied > > >> all > > >>>> times by 10). > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> This message is automatically generated by > JIRA. > > >>>> - > > >>>> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact > one > > >> of > > >>>> the administrators: > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > === message truncated === __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
