Dain Sundstrom пишет:
If it comes down to fixing OpenORB or writing our own ORB, I think
writing our own will be faster. OpenORB is quite difficult to
understand and was written before many modern concepts like IoC were
introduced. The biggest problem this the current OpenORB codebase is
that it doesn't properly implement IIOP so it cant talk to any other
ORBs (and it is difficult to find the code to fix).
Can you provide an example? We using OpenORB for our products about 5
years, it properly work with OmniORB at less.
Anyway, I say we stick with the sun orb until something better comes
along.
-dain
On Jul 1, 2005, at 12:30 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
I thought about it, but I like Alan's idea better to fix OpenORB issues
instead of reinventing the wheel. I'd believe it's the fine and
straight
way to incorporate yet another open source project under Geronimo
umbrella or grasp the CORBA concepts patching OpenORB and forking it at
some time to create a new project. I'm leaning towards the former
rather
than the latter.
I can't say that I fancy trying to implement an ORB from scratch.
I was just trying to put all the options on the table. As for OpenORB, I
don't know enough about the state of that project and what would need to
be done to make any recommendation myself. Also, I'm not aware of any
particular info on the Wiki, but again, I haven't been much involved in
CORBA so far. Other than to curse at it, of course. :) It would be
great to find a winning path forward.
Aaron
BTW, is there a wiki page about CORBA stuff? When I asked the
question I
first had looked at Wiki and couldn't find anything, so either it
doesn't exist yet or is not easy to find. All in all, I'm sure we could
add a bit more to Wiki now. The thread gives some alternatives to think
about.
Aaron
Jacek
