[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-724?page=comments#action_12315214 
] 

Jeremy Boynes commented on GERONIMO-724:
----------------------------------------

TranQL does contain some logic to order insertions so that FK constraints like 
this are respected. It could be we got over-optimistic on deferring the insert 
until the end of the transaction and this ordering is not being enforced. We 
used to always insert between ejbCreate and ejbPostCreate when defining the 
identity to make sure this was reflected in the database so that FK constraints 
we may not know about still get respected if the application creates entities 
in the right order; however, this often results in two database operations 
(insert on create followed by update on commit) which is not desirable.

I agree that this is more likely related to insert ordering rather than 
transaction demarcation; I think the change when switching from RequiresNew to 
Required is a red herring and it works just because the order in which rows are 
being flushed changes (it is not ordered except by constraint enforcement). At 
least, that's where I'd start looking :-)

> Nested transactions do not work correctly
> -----------------------------------------
>
>          Key: GERONIMO-724
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-724
>      Project: Geronimo
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: transaction manager
>     Versions: 1.0-M4
>  Environment: Geronimo snapshot built on the 2005/06/30
> Embedded Derby
>     Reporter: Ivan Dubrov
>     Priority: Critical

>
> I have the following code in my business logic EJB stateless bean:
> // Create User entity and Account entity
> UserLocal user = userHome.create(group, data);
> AccountLocal account = accountHome.create(user);
> This is the ejbCreate and ejbPostCreate for the Account EJB:
> public Long ejbCreate(UserLocal user) {
>     try {
>         Long id = new Long(IdGeneratorUtil.getHome().create().generateId());
>         setId(id);
>         return id;
>     } catch (Exception e) {
>         throw new EJBException(e);
>     }
> }
>       
> public void ejbPostCreate(UserLocal user) {
>     setUser(user); // Set reference to the User entity
> }
> This is the snippet from the DDL, note that account references the USERS 
> table:
> CREATE TABLE ACCOUNTS (
>       ACCOUNT_ID BIGINT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
>       USER_ID BIGINT REFERENCES USERS(USER_ID),
>        ...
> );
> The IdGenerator is the standard EJB pattern for generating identifiers - 
> Entity with counter behind Session. I have the following trasnactions 
> attributes (TA):
> All entities (User and Account) have TA = "Mandatory".
> Business logic (that creates Users and Accounts) EJB has TA = "Required"
> IdGenerator EJB have TA = "RequiresNew", so the identifier is generated in 
> the nested transaction.
> This should work, since creation of both entities is done in single 
> transaction (that is suspended several times when identifier generation is 
> invoked). So, this transaction contains two database inserts - for User and 
> for Account. Since both rows should be commited at once, the reference in the 
> Account table is satisfied.
> But I get the exception (sometimes, sometimes it just works)). Here is the 
> snippet from it:
> Caused by: SQL Exception: INSERT on table 'ACCOUNTS' caused a violation of 
> foreign key constraint 'SQL050705051513661' for key (72).  The statement has 
> been rolled back.
>         at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.generateCsSQLException(Util.java)
>         at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.TransactionResourceImpl.wrapInSQLException(TransactionResourceImpl.java)
> It looks like the row into the ACCOUNTS table is inserted (and commited) not 
> in the same transaction as row inserted into the USERS table, and even before 
> the row inserted (and commited) into the USERS.
> If I change transaction attribute for the IdGenerator stateless bean from 
> RequiresNew to Required everything it alway works, so the problem seems like 
> due to the nested transactions (maybe, the Account creation is associated 
> with incorrect transaction)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to