On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 12:19:15AM -0400, Jason van Zyl wrote: > On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 18:23 -0700, David Blevins wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 02:36:32AM +0200, Jacek Laskowski wrote: > > > David Blevins wrote: > > > > > > >>Yes, yes and yes. Here is the source: > > > >> http://codehaus.org/~dblevins/build/ > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >Oh, and the suggestion in the past has been to have no attachments, just > > > >upload the logs to somewhere like > > > >http://geronimo.apache.org/build/<time> > > > >or something of the sort and just have a link in the email. > > > > > > It sounds like some kind of CruiseControl's clone. I worked with CC in > > > the past and could set it up easily, but before doing so, I'd welcome > > > any comments if we should rely on CC or simply enhance Dave's script? > > > > > > > My script is simple and dumb, really. It's just a band-aid till we > > can start using Continuum (*cough*, Jason). > > Right now is it the build for the entire tree, or are you selectively > building modules? > > There's an instance of Continuum in the Maven Zone > (maven.zones.apache.org) and one at Codehaus that we could use. > > We can chat in IRC about per module builds, scheduling of builds and > whatever else but there really isn't any reason we can try it. Continuum > works fine with m1/shell scripts too. >
Awesome. I'll hit you on irc. -David
