On Jul 10, 2005, at 2:58 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Then we're pretty sure the binary will be coordinated. The next
question is whether we should include the TranQL and OpenEJB source
in our
source tarball or just the Geronimo source. I guess for official
builds
we probably need to restrict it to geronimo source for licensing
reasons.
I'm not sure if that would be compelling for unstable builds. It
would be
nice to have the whole tree in there together, even though this still
doesn't make the whole thing "repeatable" (since we still depend on so
many SNAPSHOTS).
I don't think we want to distribute source from elsewhere.
I don't want to start the shapshot issue on this thread, though, I
just wonder what others think about building a binary via the
uberbuild
and distributing source for OpenEJB and TranQL in the source tarball.
Ok - I was going to say :
"Well, given the close relationships we have w/ OpenEJB and TranQL,
couldn't we just ask those projects to do a dated unstable build
distinguishable from a SNAPSHOT?"
But I wont's since you don't want that on this thread.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
