On Jul 10, 2005, at 10:02 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 10, 2005, at 4:42 AM, mos wrote:
Just some thoughts:
Shouldn't well known and essential bugs be fixed before doing the
branch?
This could prevent duplicated work.
For example: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-715
I think that we should update the M4 roadmap to reflect what we
really think is needed before we kick this out the door, i.e.
branch. There are things in there that I'm not sure that we'll
complete in the timeframe that we want for M4.
There are also things like 715 that people want to go out for M4.
Well, how about doing a more formal M5 very soon with a clearer roadmap?
Bye the way:
Would the subprojects like OpenEJB be part of the branch of M4?
I assume this because this modules are an essential part of geronimo
and have to be closely synchronized with the rest.
OpenEJB is not a sub-project of Geronimo. However, we should use a
specific version of OpenEJB in our M4 branch.
+1
What I think that what could be done is that we could build a
snapshot of OpenEJB and label the version w/ a timestamp. We would
then upload the jar into a maven repo, preferably ibiblio.
I assume "we" == "OpenEJB people at OpenEJB project"? "we" ==
"Geronimo project" shouldn't be doing releases on behalf of other
projects, but I don't think you meant that.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
