I would suggest Geronimo M4 and HEAD both use the dated release until
something prevents you. That way you won't need to checkout and build
from source all the time. Of course, you're really driven by what
OpenEJB decides to use.
The 1.0 branch should be more stable than the 1.1 one with just bugfixes
going in.; expect a 1.0.1 build soon once we get doco and the like
sorted out.
--
Jeremy
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Except my understanding is that TranQL 1.0 is for Geronimo 1.0 and
TranQL 1.1 is for Geronimo > 1.0. So I think that means Geronimo HEAD
should use the TranQL 1.0 branch.
Aaron
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, David Jencks wrote:
so the problem is that we need to change head to expect
tranql-1.1-SNAPSHOT?
david jencks
On Jul 13, 2005, at 11:38 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, David Jencks wrote:
IMO the m4 uberbuild should work with m4 artifacts only, not ones
intended for head. Either that or it should be removed, which IMO
will
cause worse confusion.
I was actually talking about the HEAD uberbuild. Sorry.
Aaron
On Jul 13, 2005, at 11:32 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Shall we remove TranQL from the uberbuild, or switch the
uberbuild to use the TranQL 1.0 branch? It's a little annoying
that a clean uberbuild builds TranQL 1.1 and so you can't do an
offline
m:rebuild-all (since it therefore wants to download TranQL 1.0).
Thanks,
Aaron
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
tranql-1.0-20050713 has been posted to dist.codehaus.org
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Can we get a non-snapshot release of that, maybe
tranql-1.0-M4-20050711.jar
to remove one more snapshot?
geir
On Jul 13, 2005, at 12:04 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I have created a new branch in TranQL for work leading up to the
1.0
release; the name in CVS is "branch-1_0" and to check out use
cvs co -r branch-1_0 tranql
This branch is intended for bug fixes only, new features &
enhancements should continue to go into HEAD.
The project.xml has been updated so that
HEAD will generate tranql-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
branch-1_0 will generate tranql-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
--
Jeremy
