Geir, Sorry to bring this up again, i just got a bit of breathing room and want to put this to bed. (I don't want anyone to tell me later "why did you not speak up earlier?")
Can we please "plan" in public? I don't see any emails in the pmc@ or on dev@ proposing that we do this formally or "planning" about doing this. Could we talk about it here? Could you please drive the public decision making process?. My concern is that there not even a single line of code in Geronimo (or Apache for that matter) that implements JBI and we are trying to do this without any input at all from anyone. I did see the thread where you asked about TCK for JBI (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-dev&m=112118579826582&w=2) and James' reply that it is an optional module (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-dev&m=112118724601223&w=2). So i don't really see why we should be going out of the way to do this. If we do, should we start working with everyone else and start verifying them as well? (For example, ebXMLrr in sf.net - http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/ has JAXR stuff). At the least we should have a policy about when we go out of the way to certify something that is not in the core. (for example ActiveMQ is fine because J2EE TCK tests it and we don't have to get another TCK for it). thanks, dims On 7/26/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jul 25, 2005, at 10:58 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > Does anyone know if the J2EE 1.5 (now called 5.0) include JBI? > > > > No, it doesn't. > > > > Quote from http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/2005/07/25.html#a532: > > "Am looking forward to it passing the JBI TCK through the Geronimo > > project." > > > > The plan was to test Apache Geronimo with a JBI module backed by > ServiceMix and certify *that*. Geronimo would be certified, not > ServiceMix. > > geir > > -- > Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/
