Dain Sundstrom wrote, On 8/22/2005 9:14 PM:
On Aug 22, 2005, at 8:24 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
So we now have a subproject policy.
Any thoughts on taking the IBM eclipse tooling contribution as a
subproject? It's independent, has interested people that are
annoying us with patches :) adds value to the project and grows the
community in a technically diverse way, and has a plausible roadmap.
I would suggest that if we do so, we'd move the current code from
sandbox and add Sachin Patel as a committer for the subproject.
This is a sensitive issue because of there's a person involved, so
if anyone has any issues that need to be discussed confidentially,
please feel free to post to [EMAIL PROTECTED], or mail to me
or another PMC member.
I think it is a bit premature to make this a full fledged
subproject. I personally don't use eclipse so I don't know if it
builds, or is what users want. For now, I think the sandbox is
appropriate place to incubate the code and community. We need to be
careful when creating subprojects, so we don't end up with lots of
abandoned codebases. I guessing this will happen quickly for the
eclipse plugin given how many eclipse users there are out there and
we will be better off for waiting a bit.
I agree. I think that this is a bit premature to make this a full
fledged subproject. This should start in the sandbox with the idea that
it be integrated directly into Geronimo.
Regards,
Alan
