Could you do 913 as well?
So people can download eclipse and WTP pull these projects into the IDE
Eclipse and it builds and launches fine. I'll create a new section on
the wiki to do so. We now need to figure out how we can build this with
maven.
So I'm not sure if you've followed the conversation between Dain and I
yesterday on building, but I need to know which approach we should take...
(1) Build purely with Maven
(2) Use the Eclipse PDE builder and wrap it within Maven
Dain is for 1, but I feel that theres no technical advantage of doing
so, since you still have to download Eclipse, WTP, EMF, etc.. and point
the maven goal to it to be able to build. The eclipse dependencies
can't be downloaded by Maven.
What are your thoughts on this?
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Great. Will do.
Now, how is any of this built? Have you thought about docs around that?
geir
On Aug 24, 2005, at 8:10 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
Yes, 909 needs to be checked in and 884 can be checked in now also.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
899 : Done
884 : needs to be submitted under the Apache license
885 : done
907 : done
902 : done
what about 909?
On Aug 24, 2005, at 6:38 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Patches? We don't need no steenkeeng patches...
884 - please resubmit and grant ASF license
885 - I couldn't get this to apply successfully. I'm not sure
why. Most chunks failed.
888 - done
907 - failed like 885. I figured I'm doing something wrong, but
it's just not obvious.
geir
On Aug 23, 2005, at 5:34 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
Add 907 to the list. Thanks.
Sachin Patel wrote:
Would one of the committers mind checking in the patches for
884,885, and 888? I'm making changes on source files that
already have existing pending patches in these jiras and don't
want to introduce new patches until their checked to avoid
conflicts when merging. For my knowledge, how is this handled?
Are cumulative patches easily handled? i.e What happens if i
have Patch-A based on revision 1 on File-A. Then I introduce
Patch-B on File-A also based on revision 1 (but includes
changes that went into Patch A). Since both of the patches are
based on the same revision # I would assume that only one of
the patches can be applied without errors or conflicts. What
happens when the second patch is applied since the patch is no
longer based on the revision specified in the patch file? If
the second patch cannot be applied, how is one expected to know
which patch to throw out?
Thanks.
Sachin.
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
