On Sep 19, 2005, at 6:36 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I agree with Geir in that I think that we should have kept the branch; even though it is widely accepted that we will not extend it with a patch, it's just good form to do things in a consistent standard way.
Well given that Geir was wrong about the loosing/hiding history, do you still want an entry listed in tags and branches for the same code. I personally think this is a bad idea especially in light of the "widely accepted [understanding] that we will not extend it with a patch". It will just confuse users (including myself).
-dain
