Just a reminder about the Tomcat/Jetty welcome page.
Even though it is just a cosmetic change. Comments ???
Thanks
Anita
--- Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 9/19/05, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Agreed, bug fixes we do put into both branches.
> However, Aaron is
> > talking about features, IIUC.
> >
> > Just to be succinct, my -1 is a real technical
> veto on adding features,
> > not bug fixes, to both branches; though I am not
> intransigent and am
> > willing to discuss it further.
>
>
> I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion, since
> I don't think I really
> said what I was talking about. But here's an
> example:
>
> - Adding the management API for server logs. Without
> this, the console
> screen breaks if the Jetty GBean name is changed,
> and Tomcat does not work.
>
> Now this is kind of a new feature, but kind of a bug
> fix too. I'd be
> inclined to put it in, since I think we'd like
> Tomcat to be fairly well
> supported, and the current code is arguably broken.
>
> Some of the other JIRA's on my M5 list are:
> - make the server require an argument if you want to
> give a list of
> Configurations to start on the command line
> - make the deployer require an argument if you want
> it to run in offline
> mode
> - invalid references in deployment plan should give
> meaningful error message
> to deployer
> - breakage if more than one configuration manager
> found
> - installer needs to be updated to reflect current
> product configuration
> options
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
