On Oct 1, 2005, at 11:50 AM, David Jencks wrote:


On Oct 1, 2005, at 7:34 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:


On 9/29/05, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

But I want to emphasize my discomfort with harcoding a commons package into these loaders as it ultimately takes waya control from the user. As
long as we can back this out and do a proper exclusion list in a
configurable plan, then I am cool with it.


Could you explain what you mean here? I think we've already seen that
in the case of commons logging, if you give that control to the user
(by exposing a list including commons logging) and they exercise it
(by removing commons logging from the list and including their own
commons logging JAR), they get a ClassCastException -- which is to
say, it doesn't work include your own commons logging and try to use
it instead of Geronimo's version. I think the only way to work around
that is a much more detailed restructuring of our ClassLoader
hierarchy.  Do you have another proposal for "making commons logging
overridable"?


With our current classloaders I think we need to include commons logging in the exclusion list for the reasons Aaron explains. There may be a possibility of actually solving the problem with more sophisticated classloaders that actually hide all the server classes from the applications. From some conversations with Dain I think the OSGI classloaders are capable of doing this, and I think he is looking into the possibility of using them or something like them. I suspect this would be a post 1.0 change however. For 1.0 I think the best we can hope for is a configurable exclusion list, and my understanding is that you should not be able to remove commons logging from the "fixed" part of the exclusion list.


If there's ever a reason why a user would want to remove it from the "fixed" part of the exclusion list, maybe allow a minus sign or something in front of the class name in the exclusion configuration, like "-org.apache.Clogging" which says "Don't exclusde - I know what I'm doing so let me do this"

Is that a resonable compromise?

geir


--
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to