Never mind, it is being created later. Thanks Anita
--- anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Oct 5, 2005, at 11:29 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > > > >> On Oct 5, 2005, at 11:01 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: > > >> > > >>> I think there's two different types of > problems > > here that are > > >>> being confused. > > >>> > > >>> The first is a few configuration issues with > the > > zip image that > > >>> Stefan (in the tomcat config.xml) and Matt > (with > > the TranQL and > > >>> DB2) have discovered. There may be more of > > these but these > > >>> types of issues that arise but they are *not* > > issues which 100% > > >>> of customers will hit. For these types of > > problems I think that > > >>> an errata on the download page should suffice > > (with individual > > >>> replacement modules and directions). > > In geronimo-1.0-M5.zip I see a > config.xml.bak! > This issue will not affect anyone one. > > Thanks > Anita > > > > >>> > > >>> The second is another issue that Stefan > > discovered which > > >>> involves the installer. This is the type of > > thing that can > > >>> affect a lot of users and may be something > that > > would cause us > > >>> to create an M6. However, since the > installer > > is itself a > > >>> unique download do we really have to build > > another M6 to replace > > >>> it? Can't we just build a new installer off > > the M5 image with > > >>> changes to the installer alone that should > not > > affect the TCK > > >>> results? If possible I think this would be a > > better solution > > >>> than dropping it completely from M5. > > >>> > > >> I don't think we're advocating dropping it - > just > > redoing it... > > >> > > > > > > I meant potentially dropping it from M5 (as > Kevan > > alluded to) ... > > > not from history. :-) > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> Another idea would be to just add some very > "in > > your face" > > >>> statements around the download link for the > > installer itself. > > >>> Does Apache regulate what you can and cannot > > include on the > > >>> download page? > > >>> > > >>> > > >> The geronimo download page is governed by the > > project. How "in > > >> your face" are you thinking here? > > >> Probably don't want "If you use this, your > > (@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@-ed, and if you > > >> don't like it, you can go *(@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@!#)[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > >> :D > > >> > > > > > > I wasn't thinking that kind of "in your face" > :-) > > Rather, > > > something along the lines of: > > > %link% this is an executable JAR, so install > it > > using java -jar > > > geronimo-1.0-M5-installer.jar. > > > WARNING: If no selections are made in the > > installation both > > > containers will be included with common > > (colliding) port numbers. > > > It is recommended that you choose either > > Tomcat-only, Jetty-only, > > > or explicitly specify the ports for each > > container. > > > > Sure! That's easy. But isn't there another > problem > > w/ the > > installer? Can we put the additional errata > there? > > > > geir > > > > > > > > > > >> geir > > >> > > >>> Joe > > >>> > > >>> Kevan Miller wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> Without a really big disclaimer on the > download > > page, my guess > > >>>> is that approximately 100% of > new-to-Geronimo > > M5 Installer > > >>>> users will run into this problem. All you > have > > to do is keep > > >>>> hitting "Next". I did. I just never started > my > > "installed" > > >>>> server, because I'd already tested the > > zipped/tarred version of > > >>>> code (my mistake). > > >>>> I don't think an errata is sufficient and I > > don't see how we > > >>>> can ignore such a visible issue. This may be > a > > bit heretical, > > >>>> but one option is not to release the > > installer. Although this > > >>>> is a server issue, you don't hit this > problem > > in normal usage > > >>>> when running from an zip/tar "install" (at > > least I haven't run > > >>>> into any other problems, am I missing > > something?). > > >>>> Most first-time users will choose the install > > download thinking > > >>>> they're making their lives easier, when > > actually, they've just > > >>>> made their lives more difficult. Although > some > > last-minute hard > > >>>> work went into the installer, IMO, the M5 > > installer is of > > >>>> limited value for first-time Geronimo users. > I > > also think that > > >>>> the current installer is actually a > > configuration utility in > > >>>> disguise -- we should start separating > > concerns... > > >>>> BTW, I assume that actually fixing the > > underlying problem means > > >>>> rerunning the TCK tests? Thus the reticence > for > > fixing? > > >>>> --kevan > > >>>> On 10/5/05, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > >>>> On Oct 5, 2005, at 8:30 AM, Matt Hogstrom > > wrote: > > >>>> > I think that will work but users won't > > find Geronimo > > >>>> incredibly > > >>>> > useful if they have to pull a whole > new > > build to fix a > > >>>> single > > >>>> problem. > > >>>> Which will work? > > >>>> i think the errata is necessary so people > > will know what to > > >>>> do. As > > >>>> for a quick M6? I think it depends on > the > > %-age of people > > >>>> that will > === message truncated === __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com
