J wrote:
Now whether I have or have not created a logo for this particular contest is irrevelant. I am just concerned about reading about this push if you all will for 2-3 logo's that quite honestly are not good and well just seem like they had no thought behind them.
This seems awfully opinionated and is a bit condescending to the community. Are you saying the community has rotten taste and doesn't pick logos that have "thought" behind them? I personally find this statement offensive.
A logo is a statement. A logo is an item with thought. And a handful of these logo's look more like an in the box concept that just steroetypes Native American's then actually helps the apache project out.
What do you call the Apache feather then? I am sorry, but that feather is obviously attached to a form of native american image. Do you feel this way about the current Apache logo?
So the main question is this will there be a real vote with real time opporutnity to see results for all the logo's or just wait until #11 gets picked because well it sucks, not well thought out and a good number of you like it for some unknown, ungodly reason?
Is there a reason this type of verbage needs to be used? Can we engage without showing disrespect? IMHO, I think we don't need to rate people's taste factor. Again, I find this particularly offensive.
