David Jencks wrote:
While we figure out the best way to compile idl in maven2, the best module structure etc etc could we commit the patches so we don't get into patch hell? svn is much more convenient to use for source control than jira. Are the patches entirely against sandbox/ freeorb? Shall I apply them?

The patch is agains specs/geronimo-specs-corba *and* sandbox/freeorb; with this patch you can build the specs with maven 1, and then sandbox/freeorb with maven2. But it seems that Alan is working at making it all in Maven2; so perhaps we should better wait till that is achieved.

Kresten

thanks
david jencks

Hoping to have a minute to look at this very soon....


On Nov 7, 2005, at 4:52 AM, Kresten Krab Thorup wrote:

I submitted a patch for GERONIMO-1111 some time last week, and all I have heard back is that the JIRA entry now says "patch available". Apparently the changes have not been submitted to the trunk; is there anything else I should do to make that happen?

It's rather challenging to work effectively here if we cannot share code through a source repository. I understand that you cannot guarantee any particular turn around, but if it is this slow then I might as well work out of a local source repository here and then submit a new tar ball every once in a while.

FYI, we have spent some time last week on the build setup, M2 and figuring a good way to do tests and in general just figuring out how to "play by the rules here" in the geronimo build world.

Kresten Krab Thorup
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"We do not inherit the Earth from our parents, we borrow it from our children."
Saint Exupery





Reply via email to