David Jencks wrote:
While we figure out the best way to compile idl in maven2, the best
module structure etc etc could we commit the patches so we don't
get into patch hell? svn is much more convenient to use for source
control than jira. Are the patches entirely against sandbox/
freeorb? Shall I apply them?
The patch is agains specs/geronimo-specs-corba *and* sandbox/freeorb;
with this patch you can build the specs with maven 1, and then
sandbox/freeorb with maven2. But it seems that Alan is working at
making it all in Maven2; so perhaps we should better wait till that
is achieved.
Kresten
thanks
david jencks
Hoping to have a minute to look at this very soon....
On Nov 7, 2005, at 4:52 AM, Kresten Krab Thorup wrote:
I submitted a patch for GERONIMO-1111 some time last week, and all
I have heard back is that the JIRA entry now says "patch
available". Apparently the changes have not been submitted to the
trunk; is there anything else I should do to make that happen?
It's rather challenging to work effectively here if we cannot
share code through a source repository. I understand that you
cannot guarantee any particular turn around, but if it is this
slow then I might as well work out of a local source repository
here and then submit a new tar ball every once in a while.
FYI, we have spent some time last week on the build setup, M2 and
figuring a good way to do tests and in general just figuring out
how to "play by the rules here" in the geronimo build world.
Kresten Krab Thorup
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"We do not inherit the Earth from our parents, we borrow it from
our children."
Saint Exupery