I will reimport again tomorrow and migrate all of the content to the
DOC10 space.
I will let ya know when its done.
Um, not sure but we might want to limit write to the DOC10 space to
publishers, not just anyone who creates an account. We can create a
community space as a free for all, but we might want to keep a
tighter leash on the docs.
Anyways, just a thought. Now I gotta crash and get some sleep.
--jason
On Dec 6, 2005, at 1:01 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Jason D. just got a license for the confluence hosted within the ASF
...
FYI, http://geronimo.zones.apache.org is now licensed.
We have an OSS 200 user license at the moment, which should be
fine for now. I'm asking about getting an unlimited now.
--jason
...
Can't we just move the confuence (on Atlassian) V1 Documentation
Draft over here!?
Cheers!
Hernan
Aaron Mulder wrote:
I would prefer to try to keep the documentation index together and
direct people to a documentation page on the Geronimo site, and from
there have links to all the documentation sources -- Confluence,
MoinMoin, the online books, etc. I'm not sure it behooves us to try
to break out separate links to each one on the welcome page and so
on.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 12/6/05, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dain,
Sounds like a good idea. Will you be creating these URLs with the
redirects (I assume only a committer can do this)? If you let
me know
when they are complete I'll update the web console welcome and
welcome
page to reference these instead. We would need these links (just
one or
two additions to your list Dain):
http://geronimo.apache.org/issues ==> jira (problem tracking)
http://geronimo.apache.org/wiki ==> our current wiki
http://geronimo.apache.org/download ==> our download page
http://geronimo.apache.org/IRC ==> IRC - do we need a redirect
for this?
http://geronimo.apache.org/moreSamples ==> Additional Samples (on
confluence)
http://geronimo.apache.org/confluence ==> Confluence ***
*** Based on the earlier responses I assume that we want to keep the
confluence link on the welcome pages. Would this not be needed
with the
PDF that is also being discussed or do we also want the live link
as well?
There are a few others but they are already hosted in
geronimo.apache
such as Documentation, FAQs, dev & user mail archives.
Joe
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
+1 lets define some URLs under geronimo.apache.org and setup
redirect
rules for them
I suggest the following:
http://geronimo.apache.org/issues ==> jira insall
http://geronimo.apache.org/wiki ==> our current wiki
http://geronimo.apache.org/download ==> our download page
maybe
http://geronimo.apache.org/documentation
http://geronimo.apache.org/source
-dain
On Dec 6, 2005, at 8:23 AM, Paul McMahan wrote:
I agree with Hernan that the current links in the welcome
portlet are
very helpful. But I think we should only keep them if we can
be sure
they won't change in the foreseeable future. IMO the best way to
ensure that would be to set up redirects and/or aliases under the
HTTP server for geronimo.apache.org.
For example, the "Problem Tracking Database" link in the welcome
portlet currently points at :
http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10220
But it's likely that URL could become stale within the lifespan of
the Geronimo 1.0 console.
So instead the welcome portlet could point at:
http://geronimo.apache.org/problems
and the server could redirect to the actual address.
Can someone familiar with how the geronimo.apache.org HTTP
server is
administered please advise whether or not this sounds like a
reasonable approach?
thanks,
Paul
On 12/6/05, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi All,
I would like to keep the link to the confluence site (the one
hosted by
Atlassian). Jason is working on getting a confluence site
(licensed)
hosted in one of the zones. Whenever the decision is taken on (if)
moving the wiki, then we can update the console in the next
refresh or
as an intermediate "fix".
For an immediate (but yet temporary) solution I would suggest,
once the
confluence doc is officially moved (if it is moved), to have a
redirect
on the Atlassian site.
Cheers!
Hernan
Joe Bohn wrote:
When creating the Welcome Page with the new look & feel and
the web
console welcome portlet I included a link to the current
confluence
documentation. This is the "Additional Documentation" link.
I added
it because I was thinking that this documentation was too good
to not
have an easy way for the end user to access it and was curious to
see if
anybody would complain.
Given all of the debate about confluence and the possibility
that the
current confluence content may or may not be moving into a more
official
site, I guess I should remove these links. Hopefully,
whatever is
decided will ensure that this documentation is readily
available to
the
users for V1 (even if it requires one level of indirection). So
I'll go
ahead and remove the links unless somebody really, really,
thinks we
should keep them.
BTW, if we do make a complete change from the wiki to
confluence is
there any possibility that we could keep the same URL? The
Welcome
page
has always included a link to the wiki and it would be great
if this
didn't become a dead link on the installed images. It would
probably be
better if we removed all of the links on the welcome page and
the web
console welcome portlet and just point the user to the
Geronimo home
page. This would allow us to keep things "up to date".
Should I go
ahead and make this change too while updating the welcome
page and the
web console welcome portlet?
Joe
--
Joe Bohn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot
lose." -- Jim Elliot
