2006/1/6, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Bruce Snyder wrote, On 1/5/2006 4:26 PM: > > Then we should probably consider making a decision that the HEAD > > should contain 2.x work only. If any fixes need to be done to the 1.x > > code then proper branching and tagging should occur to facilitate that > > work. > > Good point. What do others think?
Hi, That's exactly what I had already proposed in my previous response. There's no need to complicate things unless some need arises. I remember when Alan stated that patches will be applied to a branch and would eventually end up as 1.0.1 or 1.1 and on. I think HEAD should always reflect the state of the main releases of Apache Geronimo, i.e. Apache Geronimo 2.0, 3.0 and on. The numbers after the dots would be in branches. > Alan Jacek
