Jacek Laskowski wrote:
2006/1/16, Jules Gosnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I crafted my last change to make as few alterations to 1.0 as possible.
It was called 'unacceptable', as far as I can tell, because it did not
go far enough. Now we are saying that we only want minimal change
between 1.0 and 1.0.1.... - so what is it to be ?
A clearly defined subset of WADI fnality will 'work' by the time 1.0.1
is released. If we work towards the necessary integration now, then we
will have a while to discuss it and get it in, if we don't, then it will
again be termed too precipitous, we will miss 1.0.1 and the current
fragmented approach to web clustering will persist in Geronimo,
impacting on a growing number of users.
Hi Jules,
I'm a complete newbie in the area of clustering, but the discussion
has kept me thinking about its merit and influence on the current
codebase. Would you please point out the revision number where I could
look at and judge yourself how much impact it could incur? Is r368344
the revision to look at?
Yes.
You will see very little in the change itself. I just integrates some
other code (WADI - wadi.codehaus.org), an HttpSession (in this case)
clustering solution.
The change should have no impact unless the <distributable/> flag is set
in a webapp's WEB-INF/web.xml, in which case it endeavours to set up a
parameterisable SessionManager within the webcontainer (Jetty or Tomcat).
Jules
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.org.pl
--
"Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it."
/**********************************
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
* www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training & Support.
**********************************/
