On Jan 22, 2006, at 2:02 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Anders Hessellund Jensen (Trifork) wrote, On 1/21/2006 5:09 AM:Alan D. Cabrera wrote:Its name isn't CORBA Server. It is being characterized as a CORBA server, which IIUC is perfectly legal.I understand it differently. In the "Proper usage of OMG trademarks and logos" section, it specifically states: Do not use OMG Marks as all or part of a product name or in or on any product, packaging, labels, advertisements, press releases, marketing materials, web pages, trade show materials, or any other materials. Thus, IIUC, we are not allowed to characterize our product as CORBA anything, unless we get permission. Perhaps we should submit a request for use on the CORBA trademark. Since we are a non-profit organisation we may get a permission to use the CORBA trademark for free.What did Trifork do for its server?
Our CORBA implementation was never that in itself; we have made a Java EE stack and that is what we have marketed it as. The fact that it includes a CORBA ORB implementation is just a consequence of spec requirements. We never marketed it as CORBA.
Kresten
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
