David Jencks wrote:
> 
> On Jan 26, 2006, at 7:53 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
> 
>> Ping!  Anybody out there?
>>
>> Jeff Genender wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was going through the generic, tomcat and jetty web xsds and I saw a
>>> number of issues I wanted to chat about and see if I can personally be
>>> cleared up, or if I am seeing some anomolies.
>>>
>>> I notice a couple of differences that weren't making a lot of sense
>>> to me.
>>>
>>> First the geronimo-jetty-1.0 appears to still have the
>>> container-configType in the XSD.  Am I correct in assuming that this
>>> should only be in the generic?
> 
> yes
>>>
>>> Second, I noticed both the geronimo-jetty-1.0 and geronimo-tomcat-1.0
>>> schemas have the inverseClassLoading attribute in them, but the generic
>>> does not.  Is there a reason the generic does not?
> 
> my stupidity? forgetfulness?? :-)
> 
> I think a better question is whether we should turn inverseClassLoading
> into an empty element in the class loading info group.
> 
> I would support this, any other comments?

I would agree, that from a consistency perspective, the
inverseClassLoading would probably better as an element.

> 
> thanks for checking up on this.
> 
> david jencks
> 
>>>
>>> Jeff

Reply via email to