David Jencks wrote: > > On Jan 26, 2006, at 7:53 AM, Jeff Genender wrote: > >> Ping! Anybody out there? >> >> Jeff Genender wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was going through the generic, tomcat and jetty web xsds and I saw a >>> number of issues I wanted to chat about and see if I can personally be >>> cleared up, or if I am seeing some anomolies. >>> >>> I notice a couple of differences that weren't making a lot of sense >>> to me. >>> >>> First the geronimo-jetty-1.0 appears to still have the >>> container-configType in the XSD. Am I correct in assuming that this >>> should only be in the generic? > > yes >>> >>> Second, I noticed both the geronimo-jetty-1.0 and geronimo-tomcat-1.0 >>> schemas have the inverseClassLoading attribute in them, but the generic >>> does not. Is there a reason the generic does not? > > my stupidity? forgetfulness?? :-) > > I think a better question is whether we should turn inverseClassLoading > into an empty element in the class loading info group. > > I would support this, any other comments?
I would agree, that from a consistency perspective, the inverseClassLoading would probably better as an element. > > thanks for checking up on this. > > david jencks > >>> >>> Jeff