I'd like to see those who vote -1 or "other" provide a suggestion for
a technical solution for the 1.0 branch, an explanation of how it
fits into the notion of a third-digit "critical bug fixes only" point
release, a suggested schedule for implementation, and a suggestion of
who will work on it. I'm also curious as to whether the suggested
solution is intended to be compatible with 1.0, a future 1.1 release,
or both.
I may sound snippy here, in which case I apologize. However, I
haven't seen anything that I consider realistic planning for getting
this into 1.0.1. The proposals (mostly dain's) that I have seen and
that I think might work involve major changes to a lot of the basic
plumbing of geronimo and are IMNSHO wholly inappropriate to a 1.x.y
release. Frankly, I think a -1 means a vote to abandon any 1.0.x
releases.
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 2, 2006, at 5:39 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 2/2/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ ] +1 Document issue in release notes and defer fix to 1.1
[ ] 0 Not that important one way or another
[X] -1 This is an issue that must be resolved in the 1.0.x branch
[ ] Other...provide your reasons.
Aaron
