I have worked on integrating the latest version of servicemix some weeks
ago (in december).
The gbeans / plan are in
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-gbean/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/gbean/
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-gplan/src/plan/
The plan is pre-1.0, so it will certainly need some minor modifications.
If the community think they should be located in geronimo modules, i can
happily move them.
I have never made a commit in geronimo itself (not sure I have karma to
do so), but I'm glad
to reintegrate ServiceMix inside geronimo.
Should i put them in the geronimo build and add a dependency on
servicemix-3.0-SNAPSHOT ?
In 1.0 branch or trunk ? or both ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Kevan Miller wrote:
My day to look at incubator proposals... ;-)
James,
FYI, the ServiceMix proposal contains the following:
The Geronimo project is currently using ServiceMix
<http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ServiceMix> as its JBI container
which is integrated into the Geronimo deployer.
At some point-in-time, this was true. However, to my knowledge, there
is no use of ServiceMix in Geronimo 1.0 or the current branches/1.0 or
trunk.
--kevan
On Nov 18, 2005, at 11:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ServiceMixProposal
Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of the projects
during incubation
[ ] +1 = I support the move to sponsor ActiveMQ & ServiceMix during
incubation as sub-projects of Geronimo
[ ] +0 = I don't mind either way
[ ] -1 = I don't support this move because: _______________
I'm obviously +1 :)
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
