Vincent,

That's excellent. I guess the Container support on the Cargo home site
is not updated yet. That's fine.

So similar to Tomcat 5.5.x container support, does v0.8 impose a
requirement of JDK 1.5 while using goals for Jetty 5.x ?

Cheers
Prasad

On 2/13/06, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Prasad,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Prasad Kashyap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: lundi 13 février 2006 20:39
> > To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: offline deployment with deploy distribute?
> >
> > Vincent, I don't wish to hijack this thread, but I thought the Cargo
> > plugin doesn't yet support the containers that ships with Geronimo.
> > The plugin for Tomcat 5.5.x needs JDK 1.5.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by the "containers that ships with Geronimo".
> AFAIK G supports Jetty 5.x and Tomcat 5.5.x. Cargo 0.7 supports Tomcat 5.5.x
> and only Jetty 4.x. However Cargo 0.8 supports Jetty 5.x and 6.x too (thanks
> to JanB).
>
> There are several ways to use Cargo:
> - through the Java API
> - through an extension:
>  - Ant tasks
>  - maven1 plugin
>  - maven2 plugin
>  - netbeans and IntelliJ IDEA plugins
>
> If you have found an issue with Tomcat 5.5.x please let us know on the Cargo
> lists!
>
> > I am interested in the work that you are doing with Cargo & Geronimo.
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@geronimo.apache.org/msg17578.html
>
> Very cool. I had missed that email.
>
> I'd love to provide all the help require for you to use Cargo. Make sure you
> talk to the Cargo team on the mailing lists. You'll find us very open to
> helping and collaborating.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> > On 2/13/06, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The offline option has gone away for 1.0.  There are Maven tasks you
> > > can use to start the server, deploy some stuff, and then shut the
> > > server down again -- not sure if that would work for you.  There was
> > > talk about creating a dedicated offline development tool, but I don't
> > > think it's been a super-high priority.  Of course, having more use
> > > cases helps motivate things like that.  :)
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if there's a JIRA for this or not -- if you get a chance,
> > > can you review the JIRAs in the "deployment" category and see if
> > > there's one discussing offline deployment and if not add one and
> > > describe why you need it?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >     Aaron
> > >
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10220
> > >
> > > On 2/13/06, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Still working on the G integration in Cargo. I need to find a way to
> > deploy
> > > > an archive before the container is started. I read on
> > > > http://tinyurl.com/8dfxj that I should use the distribute command with
> > the
> > > > --offline option.
> > > >
> > > > I'm using G 1.0 and it's failing:
> > > >
> > > > C:\apps\geronimo-1.0-tomcat\bin>java -jar deployer.jar --offline
> > distribute
> > > > C:\dev\m2book\code\j2ee\daytrader\ear\target\daytrader-ear-1.0-
> > SNAPSHOT.ear
> > > > C:\dev\m2book\code\j2ee\daytrader\ear\src\main\deployment\dayTrader-
> > plan.xml
> > > >
> > > >     Error: No such command: '--offline'
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Command-line deployer syntax:
> > > >     deployer [general options] command [command options]
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > If I don't use --offline I get:
> > > >
> > > > C:\apps\geronimo-1.0-tomcat\bin>java -jar deployer.jar distribute
> > > > C:\dev\m2book\code\j2ee\daytrader\ear\target\daytrader-ear-1.0-
> > SNAPSHOT.ear
> > > > C:\dev\m2book\code\j2ee\daytrader\ear\src\main\deployment\dayTrader-
> > plan.xml
> > > >     Error: Unable to connect to server at deployer:geronimo:jmx --
> > > >     javax.naming.ServiceUnavailableException [Root exception is
> > > >     java.rmi.ConnectException: Connection refused to host: localhost;
> > > >     nested exception is:
> > > >
> > > >         java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect]
> > > >
> > > > Any idea? Is the --offline option supported in G 1.0?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > -Vincent
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
>

Reply via email to