Hello, Sorry for hacking into the conversation like this, but as a user I need to comment:
- Geronimo folks disappointed us enough (or just me) with this 1.4certification. - Disappointed again when ServiceMix was removed from Geronimo 1.0 (such called) release. - Now please, let us benefit from Java 5.0, most valuable ServiceMix components actually requires Java 5.0. Since 2.0 release, I can run ServiceMix as a JBoss service on Java 5.0 and is very stable. Sorry again, but I thought I had to say this. Hossam Karim On 2/17/06, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I really want to be able to run under 1.4 since that's the certified > platform for Geronimo. > > It's not just a matter of classes -- in at least one place there's a > StringBuffer method called that doesn't exist under 1.4. > > Aaron > > On 2/17/06, Jordan Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Hiram. It now starts up. I've resolved the issue I opened in > JIRA. > > > > Next: The 2.0 site says that 1.5 is required for building, but 1.4 or > > greater is required for running. > > > > When starting M1 on 1.5, everything starts up fine. > > When starting M1 on 1.4, I get a NoClassDefFoundError on > > java/lang/StringBuilder at > > org.apache.servicemix.jbi.container.JBIContainer.activateComponent( > JBIContainer.java:942) > > > > Is 1.5 now required, or should we remove references to 1.5 specific > > classes? (Like StringBuilder) > > > > If we want to go to 1.4, let me know and I'll see about putting a > > patch together. > > > > Jordan > > > > On 2/17/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Jordan, > > > > > > Thanks for testing! > > > I've rebuilt with the recent changes that Guillaume made and posted > > > the binaries to the same location. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Hiram > > > > > > On Feb 16, 2006, at 7:32 PM, Jordan Christensen wrote: > > > > > > > Looks like activeio is missing from the distribution. > > > > http://jira.activemq.org/jira/browse/SM-317 > > > > > > > > Jordan > > > > > > > > On 2/16/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Hi Everybody, > > > >> > > > >> Servicemix has made some great progress in the recent weeks and I > > > >> thought it might ready to start thinking about doing a M1 release > > > >> soon. So in that spirit, I've built a release candidate for the M1 > > > >> release. Like all first attempts at a release, I'm sure we have > > > >> missed something. Please help me find the problems with it. > > > >> > > > >> I've posted the release candidate here: > > > >> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-servicemix-3.0-M1/ > > > >> > > > >> and tagged the source used to build it here: > > > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/tags/ > > > >> servicemix-3.0-M1 > > > >> > > > >> If no glaring problems are found, and everybody else feels we are > > > >> really ready for a M1, we can call a vote to make these binaries > our > > > >> M1 release. > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> Hiram > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
