Indeed.

On 3/28/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds reasonable to me; particulary as ActiveMQ shouldn't really
> chance a whole lot from here on in in the core broker/connector area;
> whereas the kernel might change a bit more between 1.0-1.1-1.2-2.x etc
>
> James
>
> On 3/27/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been thinking that it may be best to move the ActiveMQ bean
> > modules into the Geronimo source tree.  ActiveMQ actually does not
> > ship the gbean modules in it's binary distro, so I think it would make
> > sense to have them actually be maintained inside Geronimo.  The upside
> > to this is if Geronimo wants to make kernel level changes it would be
> > easier to apply them to to all the gbeans inside it's source tree.
> > Any thoughts or ideas?
> >
> > On 3/27/06, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > We also have the following JIRA issues opened that need changes in
> > > ActiveMQ to fix -
> > >         G1451 - A new TCP listener for ActiveMQ is not persisting across 
> > > server
> > > starups
> > >         G1752 - Changing activeMQ port via console doesn't stick
> > >
> > >
> > > -Donald
> > >
> > > David Jencks wrote:
> > > > Geronimo 1.1 needs some changes in the activemq gbeans in order for
> > > > activemq to be able to start and be managed by the console.  Which
> > > > version(s) should I make the modifications in?  Should I make an AMQ
> > > > branch for this?
> > > >
> > > > The problems I've identified so far are:
> > > >
> > > > - The management helper gbean needs extensive modifications to use
> > > > AbstractNames rather than ObjectNames.
> > > >
> > > > - The JDBCPersistenceAdapterGBean uses an AMQ interface in its
> > > > reference to dataSource: this no longer works as we now check that a
> > > > target gbean declares the interface you ask for in a reference.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > david jencks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
>
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>


--
Regards,
Hiram

Reply via email to