There are a few chunks of code in trunk that probably need to be moved over, like the local configuration's (config.xml) ability to remove attributes/empty values, etc.
Jeff Matt Hogstrom wrote: > All, > > Dain and David have mostly completed their work in branches/1.1. Given > that the easy part of the change has been done its time to start > thinking about getting 1.1 out the door. > > The theme for 1.1 I think is appropriate is bug fixes, performance > improvements and new features. > > Here is the order I'd like to proceed with to get 1.1 released: > > 1. Get the 1.1 release stabilized and freeze changes temporarily. > 2. Run the TCK and confirm that what we have passes CTS. > 3. Upgrade a limited set of function into 1.1 that is fiarly atomic. > 4. Complete a final CTS run and then release 1.1 to the world. > > As far as the upgrades I expect that there is a lot of function people > would like to drop in. Based on what I've seen on the list in terms of > discussion here is my initial list. I think a 1.1 release with just the > configId changes isn't really that dramatic from a user perspective so I > think we need to add some additional content. > > * Upgrade TranQL and TranQL Connector to 1.3 and 1.2 respectively. I've > added a statement cache that gives about a 30% performance boost on JDBC > primitives in DayTrader. I think this is a significant improvement over > 1.0 and is fairly limited in its scope. > > * Upgrade ActiveMQ to Version 4. I don't know all the changes so we > need Hiram's input here but I think some of the improvements included > improved configurability. > > * Upgrade the Jetty Version to address the security problem we noted in > 1.0. > > * I'll compile a list of outstanding JIRA's for 1.0 and give a first > triage on them today. > > * Tech preview of the installer. Erik, I think that it is ready to go, > is this correct? > > Please respond with your input in terms of what should be included. > Please consider that we have only a week or so to get them incorporated > before we start the final TCK run. > > Personally I'd like to shoot for a 1.2 by JavaOne (or at least June if > we can't make JavaOne) with some improvements targetted at the > schizophrenic server :), ahem, flexible server.) It would be nice to > have something to showcase at ApacheCon in June as well as the TSS Europe. > > Let the creative juices flow. > > Matt
