Matt, I need the rest of the week to get the installer ready.
I have at least two more patches to provide before I'm finished. I should have them done by the end of the week. regards, erik On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 11:04 -0500, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > All, > > Dain and David have mostly completed their work in branches/1.1. Given that > the > easy part of the change has been done its time to start thinking about > getting > 1.1 out the door. > > The theme for 1.1 I think is appropriate is bug fixes, performance > improvements > and new features. > > Here is the order I'd like to proceed with to get 1.1 released: > > 1. Get the 1.1 release stabilized and freeze changes temporarily. > 2. Run the TCK and confirm that what we have passes CTS. > 3. Upgrade a limited set of function into 1.1 that is fiarly atomic. > 4. Complete a final CTS run and then release 1.1 to the world. > > As far as the upgrades I expect that there is a lot of function people would > like to drop in. Based on what I've seen on the list in terms of discussion > here is my initial list. I think a 1.1 release with just the configId > changes > isn't really that dramatic from a user perspective so I think we need to add > some additional content. > > * Upgrade TranQL and TranQL Connector to 1.3 and 1.2 respectively. I've > added a > statement cache that gives about a 30% performance boost on JDBC primitives > in > DayTrader. I think this is a significant improvement over 1.0 and is fairly > limited in its scope. > > * Upgrade ActiveMQ to Version 4. I don't know all the changes so we need > Hiram's input here but I think some of the improvements included improved > configurability. > > * Upgrade the Jetty Version to address the security problem we noted in 1.0. > > * I'll compile a list of outstanding JIRA's for 1.0 and give a first triage > on > them today. > > * Tech preview of the installer. Erik, I think that it is ready to go, is > this > correct? > > Please respond with your input in terms of what should be included. Please > consider that we have only a week or so to get them incorporated before we > start > the final TCK run. > > Personally I'd like to shoot for a 1.2 by JavaOne (or at least June if we > can't > make JavaOne) with some improvements targetted at the schizophrenic server > :), > ahem, flexible server.) It would be nice to have something to showcase at > ApacheCon in June as well as the TSS Europe. > > Let the creative juices flow. > > Matt > >
