David,
     Thanks! More comments inline..

--- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> On Apr 19, 2006, at 6:51 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> 
> >     Thanks. What criteria has been used to set the
> geronimo.dependency
> > property in project.xml? The packaging of most configurations
> assumes
> > the packaged configuration will be loaded on top of j2ee-system
> > configuration. But the 'applications' configurations implicitly
> assume
> > that a full server, i.e jetty/tomcat is running. Is this correct?
> 
> yes.
> > If
> > yes, Should we add these configurations (specified by  
> > deploymnetConfig)
> > to the plans for documentation?
> no
> > Is this information stored in
> > config.ser and the deployer makes sure that these are already
> loaded?
> yes.   The secret is in the defaultEnvironment attributes of the  
> various builders, which add the necessary parents for each type of  
> j2ee artifact.  For instance the jetty builder adds jetty, connector 
> 
> builder adds connector, etc etc. 
    Ideally , if a user wanted to package a car for a simple
application like jsp-examples, he/she should not be required to know
all about the internal configuraitons? The user should be able to
include a single car as a dependency in pom.xml/project.xml for
standard servers like j2ee-*-server, web-jms-tomcat-server(?) etc. 

Thanks
Anita
  
 You can suppress these defaults in 
> 
> case you have special requirements by using the  
> suppressDefaultEnvironment element in environment.
> 
> In 1.0/1.2 this is not as well developed or consistent as in 1.1: the
>  
> builders have attributes defaultParentId.
> 
> thanks
> david jencks
> 
> >
> > Thanks
> > Anita
> > --- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Apr 17, 2006, at 6:45 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> >>
> >>> David,
> >>>     Thanks! How is j2ee-system configuration started now?
> >>
> >> j2ee-system is the "root" configuration of the main geronimo
> server,
> >>
> >> and the config.ser file is actually in server.jar.  The Daemon
> >> locates it in the classpath and starts it, see line 251.
> >
> >      The naming is slightly confusing. The server.jar contains
> > j2ee-system configuraion and not j2ee-server.
> >
> >>
> >> thanks
> >> david jencks
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Anita
> >>>
> >>> --- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Apr 16, 2006, at 9:20 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>    The j2ee-security configuration imports only rmi-naming
> >>>>> configuration. What about j2ee-server configuration?
> >>>>
> >>>> I think calling the server side security config j2ee-security
> >> might
> >>>> be misleading;  perhaps we should call it server-security.  In
> any
> >>>> case, it doesn't need anything from j2ee-server, so it doesn't
> >> import
> >>>>
> >>>> it.
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks
> >>>> david jencks
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>> Anita
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --- Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Apr 11, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 4/11/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> In 1.1, I moved the corba system properties into a new
> >>>>>>>> SystemProperties GBean in the j2ee-corba plan.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Dain,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Will it be merged with trunk?If *I* wanted to merge it with
> >>>> trunk,
> >>>>>>> should I try to figure out the revision by taking a look at
> >>>>>> j2ee-corba
> >>>>>>> plan and commit these changes to trunk?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> sure
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -dain
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> >>>>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>> Do You Yahoo!?
> >>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to