Alex,
Oh, I've been searching in old "directory" and "directory-network"
groups rather than "org/apache/directory/server/apacheds-core". Thank
you for pointing the right group id.
2006/5/5, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Alexei Zakharov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have created a patch to move the G directory module to ApacheDS
1.0
> > RC2. But I didn't find necessary 1.0 RCx jars at ibiblio neither at
> > /maven nor at /maven2. The most recent version is 0.9.3. The same
> > situation for MINA. So I can't post the patch right now since it
will
> > not work without these jars.
> > Alex, I just want to let you know about this situation.
> >
> Hmmm I'm seeing the RC2 jars just fine. Take a look here at the core
> jar for example:
>
>
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/directory/server/apacheds-core/1.0-RC2/
>
> Also MINA stuff is here:
>
>
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/directory/mina/mina-core/0.9.4/
>
> HTH,
> Alex
>
>
> > 2006/4/24, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Aaron Mulder wrote:
> >> > I know 0.9.3 is there (in the /maven2 repo). Not sure about
the RC's.
> >> >
> >> Ya all including RC1 should be in the M2 repo if not let me know.
> >>
> >> Alex
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Aaron
> >> >
> >> > On 4/24/06, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Alex,
> >> >>
> >> >> Can you get the jars in ibiblio and I can get the integration
> >> going? I
> >> >> am only seeing 0.9.2 in ibiblio at the moment.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >>
> >> >> Jeff
> >> >>
> >> >> Alex Karasulu wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Jeff Genender wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> If the changes are not huge, I can probably do it. Alex,
are the
> >> >>>> updates significant?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>> Since 0.9.2 I'd say RC1 is a significant update. There are
> >> package name
> >> >>> changes to comply with Directory's TLP domain name which are
> >> perhaps the
> >> >>> most significant changes. There are changes to a couple
> >> dependencies.
> >> >>> For the most part the code has been cleaned up and several
> >> *severe* bugs
> >> >>> have been corrected and tested. RC1 is also an order of
> >> magnitude faster.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> We plan to get another 1.0 release candidate (RC2) out soon
> >> perhaps by
> >> >>> the end of this week coming week or week there after. But
> >> looking at
> >> >>> emails out there from Dain and Aaron it sounds to me like the
> >> update to
> >> >>> G can take place any time after the 1.1 release. Let us
know if you
> >> >>> have any problems or need a hand while performing an upgrade
> >> either to
> >> >>> RC1 or RC2 when it comes out.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Regards,
> >> >>> Alex
