Matt, By the way, are there any plans to make TranQL an Apache project, or even a Geronimo component?
Vasily Zakharov Intel Middleware Products Division -----Original Message----- From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 6:54 AM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: 1.1 Final Items TranQL has three components. The Connectors (1.2-SNAPSHOT), the persistence engine (1.3-SNAPSHOT) and the vendors rars (various versions depending on the rar in question). Does that answer your question ? Matt Jason Dillon wrote: > Why 2 versions of TranQL? > > --jason > > > On 5/31/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Here are the outstanding issues and my proposed plans to finish 1.1. >> >> Currently there are 124 JIRAs out there for 1.1. There are also 7 or >> 8 blockers. I have not seen >> any activity on these items in the last week so I'm assuming that >> there is no resource to fix them. >> >> I propose that tomorrow I'll move the JIRA's in 1.1 to 1.2 and for >> those items that are considered >> hot and people want to work on them they can move them to the 1.1.1 >> release. I'll do this through a >> bulk change. >> >> The remaining items are: >> >> Convert remaining SNAPSHOTs to releases. Here is the remaining list >> of items: >> >> activemq_version=3.2.4-SNAPSHOT >> geronimo_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT >> openejb_version=2.1-SNAPSHOT >> tranql_version=1.2-SNAPSHOT >> tranql_version=1.3-SNAPSHOT >> geronimo_spec_corba_version=1.0-SNAPSHOT >> geronimo_spec_j2ee_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT >> geronimo_spec_javamail_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT >> geronimo_spec_jcache_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT >> daytrader_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT >> >> I will convert DayTrader and TranQL after the final set of stress >> testing. >> >> Any volunteers to convert the specs? (Alan :) >> >> Kevan, we'll need you to sign off on the activemq versions. >> >> When the above is complete I suggest we get a final test from Kevan >> and cut a proposed 1.1 for Friday. >> >> If that's good (or if there are only minor fixes) we'll push 1.1 out >> next week and then move on to >> 1.2 and beyond. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Matt >> >
