Now that we have something like a baseline of M2 in the trunk, can we please go back to creating subtasks under Geronimo-2071 for any current work that we are doing. This will help us prevent duplication.
Cheers Prasad On 6/2/06, anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David J, These are the results with rev 411279 and PluginBootstrap2. I will submit the patch in the morning. Just thought you would like to know.. Thanks Anita PSHOT\upgrade-cli-1.2-SNAPSHOT.car INFO] INFO] INFO] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- INFO] Reactor Summary: INFO] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- INFO] Geronimo Configs ....................................... SUCCESS [3.282s] INFO] Geronimo Configuration for performing service deployments SUCCESS [8.968s] INFO] System Configuration for the J2EE Server ............... SUCCESS [2.500s] INFO] RMI Naming configuration ............................... SUCCESS [1.046s] INFO] Server Configuration for the J2EE Server ............... SUCCESS [1.610s] INFO] Axis Configuration for the J2EE Server ................. SUCCESS [5.234s] INFO] Configuration for performing J2EE deployments .......... SUCCESS [2.235s] INFO] Axis Configuration for performing J2EE deployments ..... SUCCESS [3.688s] INFO] System Configuration for the J2EE Client ............... SUCCESS [0.641s] INFO] Configuration for the J2EE Client ...................... SUCCESS [6.500s] INFO] Configuration for Application Client Deployments ....... SUCCESS [3.375s] INFO] Security Configuration for the J2EE Client ............. SUCCESS [2.938s] INFO] Directory Configuration ................................ SUCCESS [3.578s] INFO] Hot Deployer ........................................... SUCCESS [21.750s] INFO] Security Configuration for the J2EE server ............. SUCCESS [7.813s] INFO] LDAP Security Realm .................................... SUCCESS [1.531s] INFO] Online Deployer Configuration .......................... SUCCESS [1.531s] INFO] openejb Configuration for performing J2EE deployments .. SUCCESS [5.438s] INFO] Shared Library GBean ................................... SUCCESS [0.781s] INFO] Shutdown Configuration ................................. SUCCESS [0.672s] INFO] System Database Configuration for the J2EE Server ...... SUCCESS [6.078s] INFO] Tomcat Configuration for the J2EE Server ............... SUCCESS [14.250s] INFO] Tomcat Deployer Configuration for performing J2EE deployments SUCCESS [2.125s] INFO] Configuration for no j2ee app clients .................. SUCCESS [1.656s] INFO] Configuration for no EJBs .............................. SUCCESS [1.078s] INFO] Unavailable Web Services deployer ...................... SUCCESS [1.109s] INFO] Geronimo Configuration for upgrading plans ............. SUCCESS [1.938s] INFO] System Configuration for the command line upgrade ...... SUCCESS [1.187s] INFO] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- INFO] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL INFO] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- INFO] Total time: 2 minutes INFO] Finished at: Fri Jun 02 23:50:34 EDT 2006 INFO] Final Memory: 24M/47M INFO] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David J, > I have been working with rev 409296, and openejb 2659. Today I > updated to rev 411279. There have been changes in o.a.g.kernel that > affect PackageBuilder, MavenConfigStore, and MavenAttributeStore. I > need to incorporate these changes into m2 plugin and retest > everything. > :( I am assuming that fundamentally the executable configurations > are > still being packaged the same way. > > > Thanks > Anita > > --- Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > David J, here's the status of my build effort on m2. > > > > I cleaned out my local m2 repo. I used the 20060524 version for > > commonsModeler like you did but used 1.4-SNAPSHOT for axis. This > > helped me get the axis jars. > > > > I skipped tests for the modules ( <skip>true</skip> in surefire > > plugin > > configuration). You can also use -Dmaven.test.skip=true > > > > I did a top down build. The build failed a few times while > > downloading > > deps. I individually built the module using : > > mvn -Dmodule={module_name} > > > > Finally I was able to get a successful build. > > > > I have attached the geronimo/pom.xml that I used. > > > > Cheers > > Prasad > > > > On 6/1/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanx Jeff. What do you think about > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJSPC-3. ? Can we expect that > > anytime > > > soon ? If so, then I'd rather wait to make a run thro' the > pom.xml > > of > > > all the apps just once. > > > > > > Cheers > > > Prasad > > > > > > On 6/1/06, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Prasad, > > > > > > > > If you really need to use the jspc plugin now, please use > version > > 1.4.3. > > > > It does not fork the compile. > > > > > > > > Jeff > > > > > > > > Prasad Kashyap wrote: > > > > > The migration of applications to M2 has been kinda held up by > > the > > > > > following 2 maven jiras > > > > > > > > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJSPC-2 (to fix jspc plugin) > > > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-45 (to fix jar'ing > classes > > to > > > > > web-inf/lib). > > > > > > > > > > I have submitted a patch for the latter (maven-war-plugin, > > mwar-45). > > > > > > > > > > Soon, I shall submit a patch for the application migration > > without > > > > > these 2 features (jsp precompile and jar classes). We can do > > good w/o > > > > > these for now. Once the maven jiras are ready, we shall patch > > the > > > > > application pom(s) again. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > Prasad > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/31/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > >> Thanx Jeff. Please see comments inline - > > > > >> > > > > >> Cheers > > > > >> Prasad > > > > >> > > > > >> On 5/31/06, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >> > Prasad, > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I can fix #1. I need to dig up some old code from the > 1.4.3 > > version. I > > > > >> > converted to a forked version because it really lightened > > the amount of > > > > >> > code in the plugin. But I have heard of this being an > > issue, so I may > > > > >> > fatten the plugin up a little bit and force a call to > javac > > once again. > > > > >> > Could you be kind enough to open a JIRA on the forking > > problem on Mojo > > > > >> > for the jspc-plugin so I can track this? > > > > >> > > > > >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJSPC-2 > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > #2 needs a bit more thought. I am not sure if the > existence > > of a > > > > >> > web.xml is the way to go on this one. > > > > >> > > > > >> What say we look for the <packaging> element in the pom.xml > ? > > Make > > > > >> this plugin relevant only for "war" packagings and skip it > for > > others. > > > > >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJSPC-3. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Jeff > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Prasad Kashyap wrote: > > > > >> > > I have all the applications migrated to M2 now. But I > have > > a problem > > > > >> > > using the jspc-maven-plugin to precompile the JSPs. I > hope > > Jeff can > > > > >> > > help me here. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > The jspc-maven-plugin is configured in the parent pom > and > > executed by > > > > >> > > the pom in each application. Please find attached the > > parent pom > > > > >> (goes > > > > >> > > in geronimo/application dir) and a pom from uddi-db > > application (goes > > > > >> > > in geronimo/application/uddi-db dir). > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Here are the problems. > > > > >> > > 1. Using the the jspc-maven-plugin makes it execute the > > other plugins > > > > >> > > in the pom twice. I guess this is being caused when the > > lifecycle is > > > > >> > > forked. See the attached mvn.log from the uddi-db app. > How > > can I get > > > > >> > > around it ? > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > 2. It will be nice if I can specify the execution of the > > > > >> > > jspc-maven-plugin "compile" goal once in the parent pom. > > The mojo > > > > >> > > should check for the existence of web-inf or web.xml > file. > > If it > > > > >> > > doesn't exist, it should skip gracefully > > (MojoFailureException ?). > > > > >> > > This way we can just invoke the jspc mojo in the parent > > pom and not > > > > >> > > have to invoke it every war child. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Cheers > > > > >> > > Prasad > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > On 5/30/06, Guillaume Nodet > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >> > >> Snapshots are not uploaded on public repos. > > > > >> > >> But they are available at > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-j2ee_1.4_spec/1.1-SNAPSHOT/ > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> Cheers, > > > > >> > >> Guillaume Nodet > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> anita kulshreshtha wrote: > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > I wish it was true! Prasad has agreed ;) to take > > care of the > > > > >> > >> >applications and the assembly plugin. > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> >P.S. How do I get > > geronimo-j2ee_1.4_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar to > > > > >> this or > > > > >> > >> >any other m2 repo ? > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com