That works too.
On Jun 12, 2006, at 2:59 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
How about GTOC for the table of contents and GERONIMO for the
general stuff.
-dain
On Jun 12, 2006, at 1:16 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Yeah, SandBox was the most representative name I could come up
with at that time, not necessarily the best ;-)
I would prefer to keep the geronimo space as a the router to all
our content. In fact I created that space as a consequence of not
being able to create a TOC (consolidating all entries) outside
confluence.
I'll be happy to migrate the SandBox space to any other name we
may want. However, I would say that if we use the geronimo space
to add/develop content we will end up loosing the organization we
are trying to achieve. I think we should have a separated space
(SandBox), maybe with a more appealing name, to hold "everything
else". Thoughts?
Cheers!
Hernan
David Blevins wrote:
Hi Hernan,
All looks pretty great. One comment below.
On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
The last section should hold "everything else", this section
will be a good place to put the historical and/or still valid
data from the old wiki that does not fit in any of the other
spaces.
1. Apache Geronimo v1.0
Apache Geronimo v1.0 - User's Guide
Apache Geronimo v1.0 - Developer's Guide
2. Apache Geronimo v1.1
Apache Geronimo v1.1 - User's Guide
3. Apache Geronimo Project Management
Apache Geronimo Development Process
Apache Geronimo Development Status
4. Apache Geronimo SandBox
Not sure if this organization calls for a vote but is pretty
close to what we have been discussing from the beginning for
organizing the documentation.
Not a big fan of a SandBox space (GMOxSBOX) and would prefer just
use the GERONIMO space for "everything else."
-David
