So is this just to be compatible with EMS or is there another handy reason that being able to embedd a map message is needed?
On 6/15/06, jhakim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One could allow Map or MapMessage or both as the second argument. The real issue is that nested MapMessage should be allowed. I have no quibble with a JMS provider allowing a Map as the second argument - as long as MapMessage entries were accepted. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Nested-MapMessage-t1788442.html#a4877006 Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
-- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
