+1 from me. thanks david jencks
--- Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did a sniff test of the installed product and I > think we are good to go. > > +1 from me. > > I shall grill it some more tomorrow. > > Cheers > Prasad > > On 6/19/06, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > John Sisson wrote: > > > Some notes in relation to documentation: > > > > > > * Clicking on the the "Geronimo Documentation" > link on > > > http://myhost:8080/ takes me to > > > http://geronimo.apache.org/documentation.html > which doesn't currently > > > have any 1.1 documentation. What are the plans > for the 1.1 documentation? > > > > I'm planning to update the web site today so it > will point to the new cwiki with the 1.0 and 1.1 > > (inprogress) documentation > > > > > > * Clicking on the "Additional Documentation" > link on http://myhost:8080/ > > > takes me to > > > > http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Home > > > which contains a warning that the documentation > has moved to > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo . Are we > planning on changing this to > > > take users directly to > http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo ? > > > > "Additional Documentation" is using a redirect > > > (http://geronimo.apache.org/redirects/additionalDocumentation.html) > to point to the Atlassian > > confluence. Fixing this redirect is part of the > web site update. > > > > I just froze (for edit) the confluence > installation at Atlassian so we will not have more > adds there > > (wanted or unwanted). I've been adding labels to > some pages on that installation to point to the new > > cwiki.apache.org/geronimo. As far as I know, we > can not add an automatic redirect directly from a > > confluence page. > > > > Cheers! > > Hernan > > > > > Other comments in-line below.. > > > > > > I'm still kicking the tires.. > > > > > > John > > > > > > Matt Hogstrom wrote: > > > > > >> All, > > >> > > >> I have created what I hope is the final release > of Geronimo 1.1. > > >> There has been a lot of work that has gone into > this release (please > > >> review the RELEASE-NOTES). Here are the final > release candidates for > > >> your review. > > >> > > >> *DayTrader Application* > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/daytrader-ear-1.1.ear > > >> > > >> I'm working on a website and documentation to > help folks out but the > > >> deliverable is the ear above. > > >> > > >> *Geronimo 1.1 Version* > > >> > > >> *Source* > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-1.1_src.tar.gz > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-1.1_src.zip > > >> > > >> *Full J2EE Jetty Version* > > >> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1.tar.gz > > >> > > >> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1.zip > > >> > > >> *Minimal Jetty Version* > > >> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.1.tar.gz > > >> > > >> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.1.zip > > >> > > >> > > >> *Full Tomcat Version* > > >> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.1.tar.gz > > >> > > >> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.1.zip > > >> > > >> *Minimal Tomcat Version* > > >> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.1.tar.gz > > >> > > >> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.1.zip > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> *Geronimo 1.1 Source Code* > > > > > > FYI (in case you re-use this mail) the line > above should read *Geronimo > > > 1.1 Specs* > > > > > >> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/org.apache.geronimo.specs.tar.gz > > >> > > >> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/org.apache.geronimo.specs.zip > > >> > > >> > > > Is there are reason why the specs distributions > don't have a version in > > > their file name? Shouldn't it be 1.0.1? > > > > > >> Please remember that only PMC votes are binding > but they will > > >> ultimately make their decision based on your > feedback. > > >> > > >> Thanks to everyone who has spent long hours > working on this. > > >> > > >> A special thanks to Jencks, Sisson and Miller > who spent long days > > >> working on getting the final release right with > License issues, last > > >> minute release note changes, etc. > > >> > > >> I look forward to a positive outcome and a > unanimous vote by Sunday. > > >> Assuming all goes well by Sunday night I will > propogate the jars to > > >> the mirrors on Sunday and declare the release > official on Tuesday. > > >> > > >> Cross your fingers, grab your beverage of > choice and let's close this > > >> release out. > > >> > > >> Matt > > >> > > > > > > > > >
