[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2082?page=comments#action_12418836
 ] 

Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2082:
----------------------------------------

It is a complete waste of everyones time to try and build up a grand unified 
patch set to get m2 working.

There will be some snags in the road while we tighten up the build process.

It is not practical to build up sets of patches and then RTC to get and or all 
of those changes in.

It is good to review the diff, but right now it is the conceptual changes that 
matter most to agree or disagree with.

> [m2] stax dependencies are all wrong
> ------------------------------------
>
>          Key: GERONIMO-2082
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2082
>      Project: Geronimo
>         Type: Bug
>     Security: public(Regular issues) 
>     Versions: 1.2
>     Reporter: David Jencks
>     Assignee: David Jencks
>      Fix For: 1.2
>  Attachments: geronimo-no-stax-v2.diff, geronimo-no-stax.diff, m2-repo.jar, 
> openejb-no-stax-v2.diff, openejb-no-stax.diff, xbean-2.0.0.pom, 
> xmlbeans-maven-plugin-2.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar, 
> xmlbeans-maven-plugin-2.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
>
> The dependencies for xmlbeans and the maven xmlbeans plugins are all wrong.
> xmlbeans pom needs to depend on stax-api, see 
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-406
> xmlbeans plugin needs to have stax-api and stax dependencies removed, see 
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MXMLBEANS-19
> At this point we can remove all stax and stax-api dependencies from our (and 
> openejb) poms.
> I'll attach the modified xmlbeans pom, the modified plugin, and the patches 
> to remove all stax mentions from our poms.  I'd appreciate some verification 
> of my results.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to