On 7/7/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/7/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My point of view is that while there might be a minimum time needed
> in total for a vote, there is no need to wait after the 3rd +1 as
> long as that minumum time since the start of the vote has elapsed.
> This vote has been going on with additions for 5 days now with no
> technical objections, although jason has enhanced the patch in
> several ways. Anyone with the slightest concerns about this patch
> has had more than adequate time to object, and they continue to be
> able to object till the heat death of the universe.
I disagree. If it's required new voting, it has to end at the 24-hour
period finish. In other scenarios, you're right (and that's why I
wrote about the 18-hour time period since Matt begun the vote 6 hours
ago).
I don't know why I claimed the 24-hour period was required. I
appologize for it, Dave. I'm really, really sorry and appreciate your
patience.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.net.pl
