Is there more to it that just changing the dependency versions?
--jason
On Jul 7, 2006, at 6:25 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 6, 2006, at 11:04 PM, John Sisson wrote:
In the "Derby library does not have line number debug information"
mail thread [1] a few weeks ago I asked whether people wanted to
upgrade to the Derby 10.1.3 maintenance release [2].
David Jencks was the only person who mentioned it should go in the
1.1.1 release but did not hear any objections from others. If
anyone disagrees with this plan, please speak up before I start
looking into this next week.
John
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@geronimo.apache.org/msg25051.html
[2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-user/
200607.mbox/%
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMO, it fixes/improves our ability to diagnose derby-related
problems. So, sounds good to me. Upgrading such a core dependency
does imply that we must run all compliance tests on 1.1.1.
Something I think we all expect to do anyway...
I don't anticipate any problems. However, if we see many problems
related to this change, we may want to consider reverting... I'd
rather see an early 1.1.1 rather than a delayed 1.1.1 with derby
line numbers...
--kevan
