Rick,

I have reviewed your patches and they appear fine to me.

You get my +1.

Jeff


Rick McGuire wrote:
> These two patches have been sitting in [RTC] state for 2 weeks now with
> no activity.  The only votes received so far have been non-binding
> ones.  These changes are holding up other work, including trying to
> convince the James developers to convert to using the Geronimo javamail
> version.
> 
> First issue, removing the javamail-transport module and replacing it
> with a dependency on the javamail-provider jar.
> 
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2147
> 
> NOTE:  The above patch is another example of an area where svn diff and
> patch don't work well together.  Applying this patch will prompt for a
> Reverse action on the patch.  It doesn't matter how you reply, because
> after the patch applies, delete the javamail-transport module
> subdirectory, and this should build ok.
> 
> Second issue, creating a new javamail 1.4 spec jar.
> 
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2148
> 
> Rick
> 

Reply via email to