Rick, I have reviewed your patches and they appear fine to me.
You get my +1. Jeff Rick McGuire wrote: > These two patches have been sitting in [RTC] state for 2 weeks now with > no activity. The only votes received so far have been non-binding > ones. These changes are holding up other work, including trying to > convince the James developers to convert to using the Geronimo javamail > version. > > First issue, removing the javamail-transport module and replacing it > with a dependency on the javamail-provider jar. > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2147 > > NOTE: The above patch is another example of an area where svn diff and > patch don't work well together. Applying this patch will prompt for a > Reverse action on the patch. It doesn't matter how you reply, because > after the patch applies, delete the javamail-transport module > subdirectory, and this should build ok. > > Second issue, creating a new javamail 1.4 spec jar. > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2148 > > Rick >