Note that if you are not using any Java 1.5 features, there's really no difference between the tiger and retrotranslated code (other than it works on 1.4).
The only strangeness is that the java.lang.* and java.util.* stuff thats new in 1.5 gets swizzled to something in retrotranslator or backport-util-concurrent but you can still debug just fine. On 8/15/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > James Strachan wrote: >> On 8/13/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> It seems that nobody work on QDox since several months. >>> (see >>> http://www.nabble.com/Anyone-developing-QDox--tf705135r1.html) >>> Does anyone know of any replacement we could use to allow java 5 >>> parsing ? >>> >>> I was thinking of introducing real annotations, but this would make >>> xbean-spring >>> JDK 5 specific. >>> >>> Any thoughts ? >> >> We could compile the source with Java 5, use source-only annotations >> maybe - then generate Java 1.4 compliant code via retrotranslator. >> > Can I debug retrotranslated code in JDK14? > > > Regards, > Alan > > Yes. Dain did a whole bunch of experiments on this if you want to know more details. From what I understand they went quite well. - Dan -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com http://netzooid.com/blog
-- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
