I'm confused, how do we vote for 1.1 if 1.0 was never released? We need to keep the version number the same.

Regards,
Alan

Jason Dillon wrote:
Okay, I'm canceling this vote. I've removed the clover bits from Genesis, and added headers to scripts... will start a new vote for 1.1 soonish.

Thanks for all of your input. Sorry I jumped the gun and created the release before the vote.

--jason


On Aug 29, 2006, at 9:10 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:


On Aug 28, 2006, at 11:25 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

On Aug 28, 2006, at 7:59 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
I appreciate that, I applaud your efforts, and apologize if I'm being a PITA. However, we also have a responsibility as a community when releasing software. I'm trying to be sure we are addressing that responsibility.

Mmmkay.  I'm taking deep breaths... :-]


For instance, I see that genesis-1.0 includes a software license for Clover? News to me, but I confess that genesis has been a bit of an unknown to me...

from
Product: Clover
License: Open Source License, 0.x, 1.x
Issued: Sun May 14 2006 21:59:13 CDT
Expiry: Never
Maintenance Expiry: Never
Key: 965016739f4031c43d67e61b0
Name: Jason Dillon
Org: Apache Geronimo

Clause 5 of the Clover license says "The Licensee may copy the Software for back-up purposes only. The Licensee may not assign or otherwise transfer the Software to any third party." IANAL ADNWTB, however, this gives me cause for concern. Can you explain what this is about?

I have no idea what "IANAL ADNWTB" means. But Clover grants licenses for open source projects. I used the license they granted to me to be used to run the site builds. This is shared configuration, which was checked into genesis to simplify the configuration of modules which need it to run the plugin.

Sorry..
I Am Not A Lawyer
And Don't Want To Be

I don't think we can put this license in on ibiblio. I also don't think it should be public in our source tree... I understand that this may make things more difficult, but it sure seems to me that we're violating the terms of the license agreement... Can you convince me otherwise?

--kevan





Reply via email to