Hi Aaron,

Thanks for the response.

As to the question; IMO the 'right' thing to do is separate out the interfaces. But practically speaking is that reasonable? Seems like that is a huge task for not much gain (unless I'm missing something from a future expected use discussion that I missed).

Now making sure I understood what you said the cause of the error message is. Since the jetty-deployer is 'provided' scope it is not added explicitly to the class loader for the console. The jetty- deloyer has the interface and impl for JettyWebAppContext. Since the jar that this interface is in is not explicitly added to the console's class path (because of 'provided' if I understand correctly) it barfs.

However, if we were to separate the interfaces of 'jetty-deployer' from the implementation classes we could put an explicit reference into the console to the interfaces and leave the implementation as 'provided'.

Please fix my lack of understanding :-)

Thanks again,

-bd-

On Sep 4, 2006, at 8:54 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:

It's actually the proxy manager that produces those messages.  It
means that the console asked for a proxy to some GBean, and some of
the interfaces implemented by that GBean weren't available in the
caller's (the console's) class loader.

It would be nice to have a larger discussion about how to handle this.
For example, do we package all management interfaces in separate JARs
from the core libraries (Jetty, Tomcat, ActiveMQ, etc.) so that the
console can add only the interfaces to its class loader?  Or are we OK
with the console just adding the full implementation JARs for
everything to its class path?

Thanks,
    Aaron

On 9/4/06, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,

The consoles (tomcat & jetty) are spewing warning messages like this;

08:00:18,511 WARN  [BasicProxyManager] Could not load interface
org.apache.geronimo.jetty.JettyWebAppContext in provided ClassLoader
for org.apache.geronimo.configs/welcome-jetty/1.2-SNAPSHOT/car?
J2EEApplication=null,j2eeType=WebModule,name=org.apache.geronimo.conf igs
/welcome-jetty/1.2-SNAPSHOT/car

To fix it we can simply remove the <scope>provided</scope> from the
<artifactId>{jetty,tomcat}-deployer</artifactId> dependencies in the
webconsole-{jetty,tomcat}/pom.xml.

Could someone who knows more about the console than me please review
the patch (GERONIMO-2344.bdudney-2.patch) here;

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2344

And apply it if it makes sense?

Thanks!

-bd-


Reply via email to