[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2354?page=comments#action_12432533
 ] 
            
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2354:
----------------------------------------

I just re-verified, doing:

{noformat}
mkdir GERONIMO-2354
cd GERONIMO-2354
svn co http://svn.codehaus.org/openejb/trunk/openejb2/
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/ server
wget 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12339827/GERONIMO-2354-openejb2.diff
wget http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12339831/GERONIMO-2354.diff
cd openejb2/
patch -sp0 < ../GERONIMO-2354-openejb2.diff 
cd ../server/
patch -sp0 < ../GERONIMO-2354.diff 
rm modules/geronimo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/pool/ClockPool.java*
rm 
modules/geronimo-connector/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/connector/work/pool/TimedOutPooledExecutor.java*
cat configs/client/pom.xml.rej (check what failed, copy diff)
vi configs/client/pom.xml (apply diff manually)
mvn -Dstage=bootstrap
cd ../openejb2/
mvn
cd ../server/
mvn -Dstage=assemble
mvn -Ptools geronimo:start
{noformat}

For {{configs/client/pom.xml}} I just had to add:

{code:xml}
<dependency>
    <groupId>backport-util-concurrent</groupId>
    <artifactId>backport-util-concurrent</artifactId>
</dependency>
{code}

something changes since the patch which caused that hunk to fail when patching.

The server started up for me with no errors. 

> Replace concurrent with backport-concurrent-util
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-2354
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2354
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>    Affects Versions: 1.2
>            Reporter: Jason Dillon
>         Attachments: GERONIMO-2354-openejb2.diff, 
> GERONIMO-2354-openejb2.diff, GERONIMO-2354.diff, GERONIMO-2354.diff
>
>
> Replace usage of concurrent classes with backport-concurrent-util.  
> Preparation for using java.util.concurrent in JDK 1.5, and reduce the need 
> for 2 sets of concurrent classes on the boot classloader.
> Sill need to include concurrent, as activeio and openejb still have some 
> dependencies upon it... but this brings us a step closer to not needing both.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to