OK that's what I suspected. So I think that means that in order to avoid confusion we should stick to refining the existing global definitions and be careful not to conflict. The stuff already on the wiki page looks good, maybe we should replace "Classification" with "Issue Type". My main concern is really about getting misaligned with the global definitions for "Priority" since that field is sometimes used more subjectively.
Paul On 9/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unlikly as that would mean changing the source for JIRA and that page is global to all projects, not just for G projects. --jason -----Original Message----- From: "Paul McMahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 18:55:46 To:[email protected] Subject: Re: JIRA Best Practices Looks good. Can we (eventually) get this information into the window that pops up when you click the [?] icon on the JIRA creation form? http://issues.apache.org/jira/ShowConstantsHelp.jspa?decorator=popup#IssueTypes Paul On 9/7/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've started the wiki page http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/jira.html > where we can capture our recommendations for JIRA usage. I added > some guidelines for the title and classification of issues. Having > clean jira issue will help understand where we are in the development > process and autogenerate nice reports using swizzle :) I also > personally find it much easier to write JIRAs if I have some examples > and help with all of the options. > > So what do you think? > > -dain >
