Why are jee5 bits in the schema/j2ee_1.4/trunk?

Do we need to rename this dir? If we want one project for all schemas, then we should drop the intermediate j2ee_1.4 dir and just make a schema/trunk.

Why is the version set to 1.0? Trunk versions should almost never bet set to anything that does not have a SNAPSHOT in it.

Is geronimo-schema-jee_5 intended to be hooked up, as it is not listed in the parents modules?

Its missing LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt

Why is jee5.patch checked in?

--jason


On Sep 12, 2006, at 2:59 PM, David Jencks (JIRA) wrote:

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2397? page=comments#action_12434292 ]

David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2397:
----------------------------------------

I've committed a build of the jee5 schemas in the tck directory. Jason, could you take a look and if it looks ok push some snapshots to the appropriate location?

Need to use the jee5 schemas without redistributing them
--------------------------------------------------------

                Key: GERONIMO-2397
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ GERONIMO-2397
            Project: Geronimo
         Issue Type: Bug
     Security Level: public(Regular issues)
         Components: deployment
   Affects Versions: 1.2
           Reporter: David Jencks
        Assigned To: David Jencks
            Fix For: 1.2


AFAICT the jee5 schemas have the same vague language prohibiting redistribution as the j2ee 1.4 schemas, so we better not have them in publically accessible svn. Just as we did for the j2ee 1.4 schemas I'll set up a module in tck that builds xmlbeans source and binary jars for the jee5 schemas and remove them from the sandbox/servlet2.5 where they are publically available today.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/ software/jira



Reply via email to