I'm saying, we should include everything we need to include to support database connection pools. I believe that's only the TranQL RAR (not the TranQL JARs).
Thanks, Aaron On 9/13/06, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, we don't include tranql in little-g either. Are you suggesting that we pull that it as well? Joe Aaron Mulder wrote: > I would definitely say that we want to keep the TranQL database > connection pool RAR in Little G (what app doesn't use a database?). > We don't need the ActiveMQ RAR, though, because we don't include JMS > in Little G. > > Thanks, > Aaron > > On 9/12/06, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> David Jencks wrote: >> > >> > On Sep 12, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> Thanks Jason. I had just remembered about the boilerplate assemblies >> >> and noticed the activemq-rar in there. >> >> >> >> I don't know why we would need the activemq-rar in the boilderplate >> >> for minimal. David, can you give some more details? >> > >> > >> > I guess I was wrong, oh keeper of the minimal :) If we don't ship >> > system-database with minimal we don't need the derby rars either. All >> > the rars are there only as a convenience for someone who might want to >> > deploy an additional instance: none are needed to run the shipping >> > server. Joe, do you think we should leave them all out of minimal? >> > I'd be fine with that. >> >> I guess my take is that we shouldn't include any of the RARs in minimal. >> Jason, would you like to do that or shall I? >> >> This also then raises the question of how the RARs will get included in >> the little-G growing to big-G scenario (or the framework to whatever >> scenario which is how I stumbled upon it). Perhaps we can add some >> artificial dependencies (for example maybe from system-database to the >> derby RARs?). Or we can just require that they be pulled manually. Any >> thoughts? >> >> Joe >> >> > >> > thanks >> > david jencks >> > >> >> >> >> I'll open a JIRA on the deps. >> >> >> >> Joe >> >> >> >> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> >> >>> The rar deps need to be excluded... Open issue for that which I will >> >>> fix shortly. And David Jencks said to add the rars to the minimal >> >>> boilerplate, so I did. If that is not correct we can move it to the >> >>> j2ee boilerplate. --jason >> >>> -----Original Message----- >> >>> From: Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>> Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:51:17 To:Geronimo Dev >> >>> <dev@geronimo.apache.org> >> >>> Subject: Peculiar things about the latest trunk build wrt ActiveMQ >> >>> I noticed two peculiar things about the latest trunk build and >> >>> activeMQ. >> >>> 1) The image size of the activeMQ rar file is now huge ... going >> >>> from something like 1 meg to a present 7.5 meg: >> >>> 7,508,415 ge-activemq-rar-1.2-SNAPSHOT.rar >> >>> 2) This is now included in all assemblies when it was previously >> >>> excluded from the little-G assemblies. >> >>> Does anybody have any idea on the size issue or the change that may >> >>> have caused #2 above? >> >>> Joe >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >