hi David,

I would also be glad to make some contributions. I am new to this so
would need some pointers as to what to focus on. I would start by
reading the specs and also getting familiar with Axis 2.

Regards
Krishnakumar

On 10/5/06, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi David,
             Count me in. I am willing to help in this. Will start
reading the specs as my knowlege in this is limited. This page cleared
some of my questions on why axis/celtix is required. Probably it will
be useful for others who are new and interested

http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-jee-50-report-card.html

Thanks
Manu

On 9/30/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 29, 2006, at 9:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi David,
> >
> > Can you please explain what is the meaning of jee5 web services? Any
> > introduction link would be great.
>
> I'm just starting to read the specs: the ones I have found so far are
> jax-ws, jaxb, and jsr109 rev 1.2 (enterprise web services).  So far
> it looks like things may be a little simpler than for j2ee 1.4 web
> services since we don't have to deal with the jaxrpc-mapping file,
> apparently jaxb mapping specifications deal with these issues in a
> better way.
>
> Hope this helps,
> david jencks
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Lasantha Ranaweera
> >
> >> I'm starting to look into jee5 webservices integration in geronimo.
> >> So far I've got as far as locating some of the specs and starting to
> >> read them :-).  If anyone wants to help or take over aspects of this
> >> that would be great!
> >>
> >> Unfortunately I haven't been able to keep up with the dev lists for
> >> either axis or cxf so I'm not sure whether anyone has thought about
> >> this before nor how much of the appropriate specs are implemented
> >> already by either project.  I have been pointed to a cxf geronimo
> >> builder, but haven't determined how out of date it is, as there have
> >> been quite a few builder changes in geronimo since the builder was
> >> written.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> david jencks
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to