The original proposal isn't on the summary yet. I'm going to spend
some time while at ApacheCon working on a more accurate summary of
the options which will hopefully give us all a bit of time from this
heated discussion to relax.
-dain
On Oct 7, 2006, at 1:48 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
There are pros and cons for all solutions afaik.
So let's just vote on the possible options.
On 10/7/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since there seems to be significant objection to one version or
specs... lets just go back to the original plan we had started to
vote on, which is similar to the model used to release m2 plugins.
It is not as simple as one version, but whatever... we need to get
this fixed.
--jason
On Oct 4, 2006, at 10:46 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> I'd like to reach conclusion on the spec versioning policy this
> week, so I spent an hour attempting to fairly summarize the two
> main spec versioning proposals: one version and version per spec.
> My summary can be found here: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
> display/GMOxDEV/Spec+Versioning
>
> I propose that we spend a day updating the summary of the options
> and possibly adding more proposals (like David's proposal), and
> tomorrow we vote on which procedure to choose for the specs.
> Please, do not sandbag a proposal you are against or unfairly pump
> up the one you are for as this will only delay this decision.
>
> Please participate early, so we can get this bikeshed behind us,
>
> -dain
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
